(2,1)-quasitopos?
structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos
An (∞,1)-topos has homotopy dimension if every (n-1)-connected object has a global element, a morphism from the terminal object into it.
This appears as HTT, def. 7.2.1.1.
An (∞,1)-topos is locally of homotopy dimension if there exists a collection of objects such that
the generate under (∞,1)-colimits;
each over-(∞,1)-topos has homotopy dimension .
This appears as HTT, def. 7.2.1.8.
If an (∞,1)-topos is locally of homotopy dimension for some then it is a hypercomplete (∞,1)-topos.
This appears as HTT, cor. 7.2.1.12.
If has homotopy dimension then it also has cohomological dimension .
The converse holds if has finite homotopy dimension and .
This appears as HTT, cor. 7.2.2.30.
An (∞,1)-topos has homotopy dimension precisely if the global section (∞,1)-geometric morphism
has the property that sends -connective morphisms to -connective morphisms.
This is HTT, lemma 7.2.1.7
Up to equivalence, the unique (∞,1)-topos of homotopy dimension is the the terminal category .
This is HTT, example. 7.2.1.2.
An object is -connected if the morphism to the terminal object in an (∞,1)-category is. This is the case if it is an effective epimorphism.
Since the global section (∞,1)-functor is corepresented by the terminal object, is 0-connective precisely if is an epimorphism on connected components. By the discussion at effective epimorphism, this is the case precisely if is an effective epimorphism in ∞Grpd.
So has homotopy dimension if preserves effective epimorphisms. This is the case if it preserves finit (∞,1)-limits (the (∞,1)-pullbacks defining a Cech nerve) and all (∞,1)-colimits (over the resulting Cech nerve). being a right adjoint (∞,1)-functor always preserves (∞,1)-limits. If is local then is by definition also a left adjoint and hence also preserves (∞,1)-colimits.
Every local (∞,1)-topos has homotopy dimension .
Let
be the terminal geometric morphism of the local -topos, with being the extra right adjoint to the global section (∞,1)-geometric morphism functor that characterizes locality.
By prop it is sufficient to show that send (-1)-connected morphisms to (-1)-connected morphisms, hence effective epimorphisms to effective epimorphisms.
By the existence of we have that preserves not only (∞,1)-limits but also (∞,1)-colimits. Since effective epimorphisms are defined as certain colimits over diagrams of certain limits, preserves effective epimorphisms.
So in particular for any (∞,1)-category with a terminal object, the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves is an (∞,1)-topos of homotopy dimension . Notably Top ∞Grpd has homotopy dimension .
This is HTT, example. 7.2.1.3.
Every (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves is an (∞,1)-topos of local homotopy dimension .
This appears as HTT, example. 7.2.1.9.
If a paracompact topological space has covering dimension , then the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-sheaves is an (∞,1)-topos of homotopy dimension .
This is HTT, theorem 7.2.3.6.
For ∞Grpd Top an object, the over-(∞,1)-topos has homotopy dimension precisely if a retract in the homotopy category of a CW-complex of dimension .
This is HTT, example 7.2.1.4.
notion of dimension
The (∞,1)-topos theoretic notion is discuss in section 7.2.1 of
Last revised on March 21, 2021 at 07:28:23. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.